When I was a kid I learned an explanation that was neat, plausible, and wrong: That the ground isn't perfectly smooth, so as soon as the flow bends around an obstacle you have a curve where water is flowing slowly on the inside and fast on the outside. Then the outside erodes more than the inside (which is actually depositing material instead of eroding because of water slowing down) and the curve gets bigger and the process continues getting more extreme until you get big meanders.
There is a major problem with that explanation, in that water does not flow more quickly at the outside of a bend, it flows more slowly. This is vortex flow. Think of a whirlpool in a bathtub. That water is flowing in a curve around the drain with the water on the inside edge right at the drain going very fast and the water toward the outside far away from the drain barely moving. The action of making the curve bigger actually comes from a secondary flow. The surface of the flow around a bend is a bit higher on the outside edge. It's like a bit of slosh as the bank pushes it around the curve. Well if the surface is higher on the outside, that means there is higher pressure on the outside than the inside. That pressure drives a secondary flow of water down the outside bank, across the bottom of the river toward the inside, and then back across the surface to where it started. This flow carries any eroded sediment from the outside bank to the inside. This is how you get the difference in erosion that leads to bigger meanders.
click for video |
The same explanation solves the Tea Leaf Paradox. When you stir a cup of tea with bits of tea leaves on the bottom, intuitively you may expect the leaves to all be driven to the outside edges. But no, they collect in the middle. The tea leaves are like river sediment and both are driven by secondary flow in a vortex.
click for real life timelapse |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: All comments moderated